The Curse of Identity

Talking about Ram and Krishna without Sita and Radha is like aloo ke parathe without aloo. 

Both men were shaped by very different journeys of life. One had to fight for his love, lose her, win her back, and eventually lose her again, only to remain within the restraints society expected him to uphold. The other stood above restraints, flowing through life as if existence itself was a play. Yet even Krishna was bound by karma. And when the moment came, he too left.

Sita and Radha are not two different women. They are two different sides of love itself.

What makes Sita unique? Or rather, what takes Ram away from Sita? The curse of identity. The burden of being “the wife of Ram.” Ram walked with restraint, and so did Sita. Her love, in the eyes of society, became something to be judged, measured, and questioned. That is the curse identity carries.

From leaving behind a palace, comforts, luxuries, and walking barefoot into an unknown forest with her husband, to living in huts and surviving exile, Sita accepted everything without questions. Even in Ashok Vatika, when Ravan offered her power and a kingdom, her devotion never moved an inch. Yet in the end, she was questioned for her purity. That is the tragedy of identity. Society remembers the title before it remembers the sacrifice.

Her love for Ram never vanished. But eyes became the curse. Maybe that is where it all truly began with the golden deer and its beautiful eyes. Humans have always been obsessed with appearances, and appearances have always demanded proof.

Radha was different.

There is barely any mention of Radha in the earliest texts, and maybe that itself says something. Radha was beyond identity. She chose her lover, not her husband. She dissolved herself into Krishna just as Krishna dissolved into her. The two were not separate anymore, like sugar disappearing into water.

Radha was never merely a character. She was the flow of love itself. Read her name backwards - it becomes Dhara, a stream. She flowed toward Krishna without restraint, without social definition, without the need to be recognised by the world.

Rukmini received an identity. The other wives of Krishna received identities. But Krishna is eternally remembered as Radha-Krishna. Why?

Because Radha and Krishna do not represent companionship. They represent union, A merger. An amalgamation where the boundary between the lover and the beloved disappears.

In every atom of Radha there is Krishna, and in every atom of Krishna there is Radha.

Sita loved within identity.
Radha loved beyond it.

And maybe that is why one became a question for society, while the other became eternal.

Click the link for: Ram and Krishna

Click the link for: For Your Eyes Only

Click the link for: Shit Happens

Click the link for: Department of Life


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Department of Life

  Department of Life Why to do karma if it’s all prewritten? It’s not all prewritten. Certain absolute points on time are written. They mark the shift in the society and individual's life. Society on large scale is not the subtotal of individuals. It’s not summation rather integration. In summation you only add. In integration you add all the area under the curve. Society is complex web of beliefs, individuals and practices. Whereas individual being a component of society is raised by society itself. But more importantly an individual inherits some legacy from family. This may be anything. Some inherit materialistic possessions, some knowledge and others nothing at all. This is entirely based on the karmas done in past life. Now how would have the cycle of karmas begin at first. Consider human karmas as a fuel to the cosmic engine of the cosmic vehicle. Just like petrol drives a car, similarly our karmas drive the cosmic vehicle. First let me introduce you to animism. Thi...
Read more

Shit Happens.

Humans evolved by living in collective shared memory and experience. It was because we were nomads for majority of our history and have settled only for past 12000 years. The evolution of our body was aimed at highest survival chances. The cells would have analyzed, stored and adapted to numerous patterns in order to achieve the most restrain less path. We evolved from nomads to settlements. We have traversed from collective security of tribe to individual good. Survival needed a construct. Construct ensured collective security and shared benefit. But it came with its drawbacks. The fear of the opinion of others and the fear of being left alone. We evolved, but we also degraded the construct we live. Humans learn by mimicking. Earlier life was pre dominantly controlled by this construct. Modern life is controlled by so called State, which is only 250 years old. Think about it, why is that you are only two brother or sister? Simple cause State wanted it that way. During Emergency (1...
Read more

For Your Eyes Only

For the crimes of the eyes, the heart paid the price. For the crimes of the eyes, many wished they were blind. From the crimes of the eyes, life taught “living.” Whether the world outside is real or a simulation is uncertain. But the world inside the head is undeniably perception. An image received upside down by the retina, carried through rods and cones to the brain at unimaginable speed, might just be the root of every problem at hand. Eyes let us see. And that itself is the core problem. Because when one sees, one compares. When one does not see, one does not compare. Let us look through a few moments. Take the 2019 run-out of MS Dhoni.Or Rohit Sharma stepping out to Glenn Maxwell in the 9.5 over of 2023. Everyone who witnessed those tears cried too. Even today, memes roam around with the line: “Khada hoon aaj bhi wahi.” If only one could unsee certain moments, one would. When eyes see, eyes compare. Comparison creates relativity - either inferiority or superiori...
Read more